Minimize exposure
Remove unnecessary resources, unreleased rules, debug artifacts, and accidental secrets. Measure the information removed separately from functional resistance.
Software protection
Modernize without handing over your playbook.
Find out what your shipped software reveals today, then design the AI-native version to expose less — with evidence that the change made a difference.
START WITH EVIDENCEWhat can an observer
What can an observer
actually reproduce?
Code recovery, resource extraction, and behavior imitation are different risks. Our assessment keeps them separate so recommendations target the problem you have.
Get a free application reviewShipped binaries & resources Inspect
Documentation & user workflows Observe
Inputs, outputs & edge cases Compare
Architecture & proposed changes Retest
Protection is an architecture decision
Reduce what you distribute.
Preserve what customers need.
Move valuable execution
Where the product permits it, keep selected proprietary engines behind controlled backend services. Browser JavaScript and WebAssembly still reach the user.
Control access & observe
Design authorization, appropriate quotas, and monitoring around APIs. Preserve useful access while investigating suspicious extraction patterns.
The ReplicaLens pilot
A useful result.
Even when the fix
doesn’t stop copying.
Our synthetic pricing fixture tested artifact inspection, an agent reconstruction attempt, and independent output comparisons. Removing two unused rule rows reduced disclosed information, but both attempts still matched all tested pricing cases.
Read the methodology and limitsSYNTHETIC LAB / NOT A CUSTOMER BENCHMARK
144 / 144
Pricing cases matched in each attempt
2 rules
Unused rows removed from shipped resources
Conclusion: less unnecessary disclosure; no demonstrated resistance for the tested pricing behavior.
A few useful answers
Before we begin.
Does this replace a penetration test?
No. A replication-risk assessment examines implementation exposure and reproducibility. A penetration test has a different scope and should be commissioned separately where needed.
Will moving to the web make our product uncopyable?
No. Moving an engine server-side changes what implementation is distributed. Visible workflows, API outputs, and previously released binaries remain relevant to replication risk.
Can you assess software without source access?
We can scope an assessment around authorized binaries, documentation, and observable behavior. Source access supports deeper architecture analysis but is not required for every exposure question.
What does the complimentary review include?
An initial review of one agreed workflow or exposure concern, subject to fit and authorized access. You receive observations, limitations, and a proposed next step. It is not an exhaustive audit or certification.
Free application review
Your customers are already being sold AI. Let’s make sure it’s yours.
Pick one workflow. We’ll show you what an AI-native version looks like, what it would take, and what your app exposes today — free.